Grey literature can be more current than commercially published literature. The commercial publication process takes a long time; new useful information may be published as grey literature before commercial publishers release the same information.
Grey literature may better reflect research into niche, understudied topics, that do not have the proper funding to create commercially published research. Grey literature is often more regionally specific, giving information about research topics in greater detail and regional specificity than commercially published literature.
We now know that Grey Literature is the opposite of Scholarly, Peer-Reviewed literature. Unlike Peer-Reviewed literature, Grey Literature is not reviewed by experts before being published, which means readers have to do all the work of evaluating the literature themselves. Why would someone use Grey Literature when it is generally less reliable and requires more evaluation on the users' part than Peer-Reviewed Literature? Among other reasons, Grey Literature is often...
The peer-review process takes time to complete, sometimes up to 3 months. This means that scholarly articles published today can already be weeks or months out of date. If researchers need very current information, they will need to look to grey literature sources.
As a student, have you ever read a scholarly article and felt very lost and confused? Academic writing is known for being overly complicated and confusing for readers to keep up with. While there are many examples of Grey Literature being equally confusing (Legal Documents and Government technical reports for example), there are many types of Grey literature that are easier to understand and read than scholarly articles. Newspaper articles, for example, are usually much easier to understand than an academic article on the same topic.
Universities and other academic institutions have a diversity problem and that is reflected in the scholarly and peer-reviewed literature that is published. Historically, scholarly literature was made by white, western-centric, affluent men because that is who could access the academic institutions that produce such literature. Diversity efforts have changed this to some extent, but it is a major problem. This means that scholarly literature is often missing important viewpoints and information that could be extremely valuable for building knowledge. Grey literature does not require authors to have made it past all the barriers and hurdles of academia so it is often more diverse than scholarly literature.
Anyone who specializes in a certain academic field knows how niche academia can get in their literature. However, there is a limit to how niche academia can get in some areas and there are several types of information that academia typically does not cover. For example, local water quality data will likely never be published in an academic journal, but is consistently published by local government sources.
..than scholarly, peer-reviewed research. Keep in mind that no matter the reason for using grey literature, you will need to properly evaluate it.
Adapted from Why Use Grey Literature from the University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign Grey Literature LibGuide.
It is important to critically evaluate your grey literature sources while you research. Jess Tyndall at Flinders University created the AACODS checklist for evaluating grey literature sources. Consider the following questions, while you search for grey literature.
Authority |
Who is responsible for the content? If there is an individual author, what is their affiliation? Are they an established expert in their field? Do they have appropriate professional qualifications? Are they cited by other authors? If the source is written by a group/body, what is their reputation? Are they well-known authorities in the field? In all cases, does the source have a reputable, well-organized reference list/bibliography? |
Accuracy |
Does the source have a clearly stated purpose? Does it achieve said purpose? Is it well-supported with credible sources? |
Coverage |
Does the source state its parameters (e.g. its limits in content coverage, population group, geographic limits)? |
Objectivity |
Is the author's opinion, or standpoint, clear? Does the work appear balanced in presentation? |
Date |
Is the date of publication clearly visible? If not, can it be easily ascertained from the content? Do they cite important contemporary works? |
Significance |
Is the source valuable/useful for your research? Does it add to the body of work in its field? |
Facebook Twitter Instagram